Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for acute ischemic stroke by resolving phlegm and unblocking fu-organs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Many researchers have adopted resolving phlegm and unblocking fu-organs (RPUF) therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients and yielded beneficial results in terms of clinical symptoms. However, there has been no systematically pooled analysis of RPUF therapy for AIS to date. Therefore, a well-designed systematic review and meta-analysis is necessary. AIM: This systematic review aims to determine the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapy for resolving phlegm and unblocking fu-organs (RPUF) for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: Eight databases were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving RPUF therapy for AIS. The primary outcome included the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and the secondary outcomes were the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the Neurological Deficit Score (NDS), Barthel Index (BI), Fugel-Meyer assessment (FMA), and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used to assess risk of bias. The quantitative synthesis was analyzed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0 software. RESULTS: The systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 61 RCTs with a total of 6056 participants. RPUF prescriptions combined with usual care were superior to usual care alone in individuals with AIS, as evidenced by decreased mRS (MD＝-0.34; 95%CI [-0.65, -0.03]; P＝0.03), NIHSS (MD＝-3.38; 95%CI [-4.07, -2.68]; P＜0.00001), and NDS (MD＝-3.65; 95%CI [-4.07, -3.24]; P＜0.00001), as well as improved BI (MD＝10.4; 95%CI [8.21, 12.59]; P＜0.00001), FMA (MD＝20.41; 95%CI [17.40, 23.41]; P＜0.00001), and GCS (MD＝3.08; 95%CI [1.95, 4.20]; P＜0.00001). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse effects between the RPUF therapy group and the usual care group. CONCLUSION: RPUF therapy appears to be an effective and safe approach for treating AIS; it could decrease mRS, NIHSS, and NDS while improving BI, FMA, and GCS. However, the methodological quality of the included RCTs was far from sufficient, and further high-quality, well-designed RCTs with long-term follow-up are still required.

Efficacy and safety of Panax notoginseng saponins (Xuesaitong) for patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Stroke is the major cause of mortality and permanent disability and is associated with an astonishing economic burden worldwide. In the past few decades, accumulated evidence has indicated that Xuesaitong (XST) has therapeutic benefits in cases of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our study aimed to provide the best current body of evidence of the efficacy and safety of XST for patients with AIS. Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched eight electronic databases from inception to 17 July 2023 for relevant RCTs. The investigators independently screened trials, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 16.0 software. Results: In total, 46 RCTs involving 7,957 patients were included. The results showed that XST improved the long-term functional outcomes with lower modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (MD = -0.67; 95% CI [-0.92 to -0.42]; p < 0.00001) and a higher proportion of functional independence (mRS ≤2) (RR = 1.08; 95% CI [1.05 to 1.12]; p < 0.00001). Low-quality evidence indicated that XST improved the activities of daily living (MD = 10.17; 95% CI [7.28 to 13.06]; p < 0.00001), improved the neurological impairment (MD = -3.39; 95% CI [-3.94 to -2.84]; p < 0.00001), and enhanced the total efficiency rate (RR = 1.19; 95% CI [1.15 to 1.23]; p < 0.00001). No significant difference was found in the all-cause mortality or incidence of adverse events between the XST and control groups. The certainty of evidence was estimated as moderate to very low. Conclusion: Presently, the administration of XST within 14 days of AIS is associated with favorable long-term functional outcomes. In addition, XST can improve activities of daily living, alleviate neurological deficits, and has shown good tolerability. However, the current evidence is too weak, and the confidence of evidence synthesis was restricted by the high risk of bias. Given the insufficient evidence, appropriately sized and powered RCTs investigating the efficacy and safety of XST for patients with AIS are warranted. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=446208, CRD42023446208.